STOPTHEKINSEYINSTITUTE.ORG 原始網址：http://www.stopthekinseyinstitute.org/kinsey-brief/
On April 23, 2014 the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction was granted special consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations (ECOSOC). This decision was based in part on misleading testimony regarding the nature of their work provided by a Kinsey Institute representative to the United Nations Committee on Nongovernmental Organizations.
On April 23, 2014 the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender and Reproduction was granted special consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations (ECOSOC). This decision was based in part on misleading testimony regarding the nature of their work provided by a Kinsey Institute representative to the United Nations Committee on Nongovernmental Organizations.
The Kinsey
Institute was originally founded as an affiliate of Indiana University in 1947
by zoologist Alfred Kinsey under the name “Institute for Sex Research.” This
brief will show how the past and present actions, goals and aims of the
Institute merit condemnation and censure rather than the legitimacy, prestige
and access that UN consultative status affords them and which enables them to
perpetuate their harmful work on a much larger world stage.
2014年4月23日，金賽性、性別與生殖研究院獲得了由聯合國經濟及社會理事會（ECOSOC）授予的特別諮詢地位。聯合國所作的此項決定某種程度上是基於金賽研究院的一位代表在聯合國非政府組織委員會上的證詞，而這篇關於該機構研究工作之實質內容的證詞事实上相當具有誤導性。
金賽研究院最早由動物學家阿爾弗萊德・金賽於1947年創立，當時名為「性研究院」并附屬於美國印第安納大學。本文將透過揭露金賽研究院過去及現今的种种行為、目的及宗旨，表明該機構理應受到國際社會嚴厲的譴責和批評，它根本不配獲得聯合國諮詢地位所赋予的合法性、聲望及各种出入機會，這些權利只會助紂為虐，使得該機構可以在世界上更大範圍内延續其極具危害性的工作。
1. The Kinsey Institute’s
Claim to the UN: “We are not an advocacy organization.”
1. 金赛研究院向聯合國宣稱：「我們不是一個倡議型組織。」
The Kinsey Institute has been and continues to be an aggressive
sexual rights advocacy organization. Their research and advocacy has
contributed to the widespread promotion of promiscuous sex and the
liberalization of sex laws to the detriment of children, adults, families and
societies. The Institute cosponsors
and organizes advocacy events and helps fund controversial sexual rights
advocacy groups.
事實上，金賽研究院一直以來都是一個激進的性權倡導組織。該機構的研究和倡議已经使得整个社會廣泛鼓吹性濫交之風以及不斷放寬性法律，这對兒童、成人、家庭和社會都造成了危害。此外，該研究院常積極協辦和組織各項倡議活動，資助一些頗具爭議性的性權倡導組織。
Kinsey’s testimony and research have been credited with convincing
state legislatures across the U.S. to reduce penalties for abortion, rape,
statutory rape, seduction, prostitution, wife and child battery, sodomy,
bestiality, indecent exposure, incest, bigamy, nudity, obscenity, adultery,
fornication, adult-child sex, illicit cohabitation, pornography, and more. A
group of 2,400 conservative U.S. lawmakers warn of the dangerous influence of
the Kinsey Institute’s work on American laws. Westlaw, the most widely used
legal database in the world, has more than 650 Kinsey citations in law journals
from 1980 to 2000 and significantly important law journal articles citing to
Kinsey research from 1948 to 1980. In most cases, these citations refer to Kinsey’s
fraudulent data to support the liberalization of sex laws and for reducing
penalties for sex crimes.
现今美國許多州議會早已被金赛理论說服，對許多罪行都採取了減刑的措施，例如墮胎、強姦、法定強姦（與未成年人發生性關係）、誘姦、賣淫、毆打妻子及兒童、雞姦、獸交、猥褻露體、亂倫、重婚、裸露、猥褻、通姦、私通、成人與兒童發生性行為、非法同居、色情等等，這一切都歸咎於金賽的證詞及其相關研究。一群由2400名美國保守立法委員组成的團體早已就金賽研究院的工作对美國法律造成的危害性影響提出了警告。倘若搜尋全世界最為廣泛使用的法律數據庫--萬律數據庫（Westlaw），則會發現在介於1980年至2000年之間的法律期刊中，關於金賽的引文超過了650條，而在1948年至1980年期間，許多至關重要的法律期刊文章也都引用了金賽的研究。大多數情況下，這些引文均參考了金賽那些錯誤的研究數據，用以支持放寬性法律和對於性犯罪進行減刑。
2. The Kinsey Institute’s
Claim to the UN: “We are a research institute.”
2.
金赛研究院向聯合國宣稱：「我們是一個研究機構。」
The Kinsey Institute has perhaps one of the world’s worst
reputations for promoting fraudulent and biased research on human sexuality. The
Institute’s sex research has been largely dismissed by qualified researchers
for failing to meet even minimal standards of accepted research design, such as
intentionally selecting non-representative sexually deviant research subjects, and
attempting to draw conclusions about the prevalence of these deviant behaviors
in the entire U.S. population, etc. This flawed sampling technique made
sexually deviant behaviors appear to occur far more often in the general
population than they actually did, thus, greatly influencing public thinking
about sexual norms and sex-related laws. And pedophile groups still use the Kinsey Institute’s flawed
research to support and defend adult-child sex.
由於推廣偽造和有偏差的人類性學研究，金賽研究院恐怕算是世界上最臭名昭著的機構之一了。該院的性研究已遭到眾多具有資歷的研究員的反駁，因其連一個合格研究設計的最低標準都沒有能夠達到，例如故意選擇非代表性的性偏差行為者當作研究對象，并試圖由此得出關於這些偏差行為在整體美國人民中的盛行率等等。如此錯誤的抽樣技術使得性偏差行為看上去在一般人群中發生的機率大大增加，乃至超出了它們現實中出現的頻率，因而這個結論極大地影響了公眾對於性規範和性相關法律之看法。而那些戀童癖團體也仍在利用金賽研究院的錯誤研究來支持成年人與兒童性交行為并且為之辯護。
Kinsey’s claim that children can and should be sexual from the
earliest stages of life has become the basis for virtually all modern
comprehensive sexuality education programs taught around the world. Dr. Miriam
Grossman explains that Wardell Pomeroy (Kinsey’s research field director and
co-author of Sexual Behavior in the Human Male ) served on the original board
of directors of SIECUS, that SIECUS has since partnered with the United Nations
Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), extensively and
that one of the main authors of UNESCO’s highly controversial International
Guidelines on Sexuality Education was a former director of SIECUS.
金賽聲稱從生命的最早階段開始，兒童是可以也應該有性慾的。他的此番觀點早已成為當今世界上幾乎所有現代綜合型性教育課程的基礎。葛蘿絲曼醫師（《你們在教我孩子什麼？：從醫學看性教育》之作者）對此曾有說明，Wardell Pomeroy（金賽研究的現場主管以及《人類男性性行為》的共同作者）曾任職於美國性知識及性教育委員會(SIECUS)最早的董事會。此外，自從美國性知識及性教育委員會(SIECUS)與聯合國教科文組織（UNESCO）廣泛合作以來，後者所推廣的具有高度爭議性的《性教育國際指南》之主要作者之一就是該委員會(SIECUS)的前主管。
3. The Kinsey Institute’s
Claim to the UN: “We advocate for responsible sexual behavior.”
3.
金赛研究院向聯合國宣稱：「我們倡導負責任的性行為。」
The Kinsey Institute’s original research team practiced and promoted
irresponsible and illegal sexual behaviors and continues to defend these
actions today.
金賽研究院研究團隊的原班人馬曾從事和推廣不負責任及非法的性行為，直到今天他們甚至還在為這些行為辯護。
Kinsey
protected the identities of known pedophiles and asked them to document their
abuse thereby giving legitimacy to, and no doubt encouraging, sex crimes on
children in the name of science. (…) Esther White, a
woman now in her 80s, believes that it was Kinsey who encouraged her father and
grandfather to sexually abuse her when she was a little girl and to time her
sexual responses with a stopwatch. But the Kinsey Institute dismisses Esther’s
claims with a statement on their website. The Institute also denies any
collaboration with pedophiles, yet Kinsey himself clearly states that he used
information provided by adult men who had sexual encounters with children.
金賽保護那些已知戀童癖者的身份，并要他們記錄自己性虐待兒童的過程，以科學之名賦予這些罪犯合法性，鼓勵他們從事以兒童為對象的性犯罪行為。(…) Esther White如今已是一位八十多歲的老奶奶了，她一直認為，在她年幼的時候，正是金賽慫恿她的父親及祖父對她進行性虐待，並且還用馬錶測量她每次性反應的時間。然而金賽研究院卻在自家的網站上發表聲明否認了Esther的說法。此外，金賽研究院也拒絕承認與戀童癖者有過任何合作，然而矛盾的是金賽本人卻明確表示他採用了曾與兒童發生性關係的成年男人所提供的信息。
It is surprising that not only did Kinsey collect data from child
abusers, but he accepted them as scientifically valid, or at least he presented
it to the world as if it were valid scientific research showing children are
sexual from birth. Former Kinsey institute director John Bancroft admitted that
Kinsey lied about his data, yet the Institute is still publishing them as if
they were valid.
讓人不可思議的是，金賽不僅從兒童性虐待者那裡搜集數據，他甚至還認可這些數據，認為它們有科學根據，或者說至少他將其作為有效的科學研究呈現給世人，想證明兒童從一出生就有性慾。金賽研究院前任院長John Bancroft曾經承認，金賽謊報了他的研究數據，可是該研究院目前卻仍然在出版這些看似合理的研究。
Kinsey’s pseudo-scientific
research on human sexuality attempting to prove to the world that children are
sexual from birth and that promiscuous sexual behaviors of all kinds and at all
ages are prevalent. And Kinsey goes so far as
to suggest that sexual stimulation is beneficial to babies. He even suggests
that children need the “help” of adults in discovering their sexuality,
especially effective methods of masturbation. This is not advancing sexual
health, but rather sexual abuse, as defined universally by laws around the
world.
金賽通過其所謂的關於人類性慾的科學研究，試圖向世人證明兒童從一出生就有性慾，而且各種性濫交行為在各個年齡層都是普遍存在的。更過分的是，金賽還提出性刺激對嬰兒很有益处。他甚至暗示兒童需要成年人的「幫助」以便發掘自己的性慾，尤其是透過各種有效的自慰方式。依照世界各地法律所定義的來看，顯然金賽根本不是在促進性健康，而是在推動性虐待。
The Kinsey Institute has repeatedly refused to make their files
available for scientific review or for the victims of the Kinsey pedophile
reports. The Institute even refused to offer information in the investigation of
a child victim who was suspected to have been killed by von Balluseck, a
German pedophile with whom Kinsey communicated. It is
ironic that virtually the only sexual behavior on which the Kinsey Institute
claims to take a “moral” stand is the protection of known criminal child sex
abusers.
直到如今，面對不論是想進行科學檢驗的研究者或是金賽戀童癖報告裡的受害者，金賽研究院都一直拒絕提供任何資料。該研究院甚至還拒絕提供資訊來協助調查一個兒童謀殺案，該名兒童受害者懷疑已被德國籍戀童癖Von Balluseck謀殺，
而金賽曾與之有過聯絡。諷刺的是，事實上金賽研究院對於性行為唯一一次表明「道德」立場的做法竟然是保護已知的兒童性虐待罪犯。
4. The Kinsey Institute’s
Claim: We advance “sexual health.”
4.
金赛研究院向聯合國宣稱：「我們致力於促進『性健康』。」
Alfred Kinsey and his early research team practiced and promoted
high-risk sexual behaviors, and the Kinsey Institute continues to endorse
high-risk sexual practices such as anal sex and the extensive use of
pornography today.
阿爾弗萊德・金賽及其早期的研究團隊曾實踐並推廣高風險性行為，而如今金賽研究院則繼續為許多高風險的做法背書，例如肛交和廣泛使用色情品。
Kinsey and his colleagues practiced sexual masochism, masturbation,
adultery, and homosexuality. Kinsey is also reported to have shared his wife
sexually with other men, engaged in sex acts with his fellow male researchers,
and often had sex with men he interviewed for his research. All of these
behaviors run counter to the advancement of sexual health. Kinsey believed that
there were “only three kind(s) of sexual abnormalities: abstinence, celibacy,
and delayed marriage,” ironically, all practices that promote legitimate sexual
health.
金賽及其同事都曾有過性受虐、自慰、通姦和同性戀等行為。此外，還有報導說金賽曾與其他男人共享自己的妻子，與他的男性研究夥伴發生性行為，以及常與其訪談的研究對象有性關係。而所有這些行為與所謂的「促進性健康」完全是背道而馳。在金賽看來，世上「僅有三種行為是『性異常』：禁慾、獨身和晚婚」。諷刺的是，恰恰是以上這三種行為才能夠促進真正的性健康。
The Kinsey Institute promotes anal sex with condoms as “safe”
despite scientific evidence to the contrary. On their website for college-age
adults-kinseyconfidential.org-the Kinsey Institute promotes condoms for use in anal
sex, saying that doing so makes it “absolutely safe.” Kinsey Institute staff
members have also been accused of promoting radical unhealthy sexual
ideologies. A 1980 Time magazine article called “Attacking the Last Taboo”
quoted Wardell Pomeroy and referred him as being part of the “pro-incest
lobby.”
金賽研究院認為戴套肛交是一種安全性行為并且極力推廣，完全無視現有科學證據的反對。在為大學階段成年人設立的網站上（kinseyconfidential.org），金賽研究院大力宣傳戴套肛交，并宣稱只要戴套就「絕對安全」。此外，研究院的員工也曾因推廣激進且不健康的性觀念而受到指控。1980年載於時代周刊的一篇題為「向最後的禁忌發起進攻」的文章曾引用Wardell
Pomeroy (金賽《人類男性性行為》的共同作者)并將其視為「支持亂倫遊說陣營」的一份子。
Recent research on the human brain shows that viewing pornography
can create addictions that negatively impact the brain in the same way as
heroin and that pornography is especially damaging to the developing brains of
children. Yet the Kinsey Institute has defended using hardcore pornography in
research experiments and denies that pornography consumption is addictive as
recently as March, 2014. The Kinsey Institute proudly houses a huge collection
of pornography on-site available for student researchers and others to view.
Their porn art collection includes 48,000 photographs, 7,000 artifacts, 8,000
films, and 4,000 videos. This is not the position
of an organization truly interested in promoting sexual health.
近期關於人類大腦的研究顯示，觀看色情製品使人上癮，并如同吸食毒品海洛因一樣會對大腦造成有害影響，尤其會嚴重損害兒童正在發育的大腦。可是金賽研究院卻仍在為研究實驗中使用露骨色情製品的做法進行辯護，甚至直到最近2014年3月，該院還矢口否認消費色情製品會讓人成癮。金賽研究院得意地表示院內收藏了大量的色情製品，並且學生研究員以及其他人都可以上網自由觀看。該院的色情藝術藏品包含了48000張照片、7000件工藝品、8000部電影以及4000段視頻。顯然這完全不是一個真正關心促進性健康的組織應持有的立場。
The Kinsey Reporter Cell
Phone App: A Cause for Concern for All Countries
「金賽通訊員」手機App：亟待各國關注
The users of the new “Kinsey Reporter” cell phone app are invited to
“submit reports about any sexual behavior they observe-including their own-anytime
and anywhere. The app allows users to indicate the gender, age, attitude,
numbers of people involved and other indicators, including an “under 20”
designation that would allow reports about sexual activity involving teens,
children, or even infants.
新款「金賽通訊員」手機app的用戶受邀於任何時間或地點「提交所觀察到的任何性行為之報告，包括他們自己的」。這款app讓用戶可以標示性別、年齡、心態、人數和其它指標，還包括一個「20歲以下」的指定標示，這樣用戶就可以通報那些有青少年、兒童甚至嬰兒參與的性行為了。
This model clearly illustrates that Kinsey’s current disciples are
using the same tactics Kinsey used before them: collect questionable, unverifiable,
unrepresentative data, present it to the public, and watch as the world
believes the worst about itself and adjusts its laws to include and even
protect and promote harmful sexual behaviors and perspectives. (…)These data will likely be used to make the case either by the Kinsey
Institute or the sexual rights activist groups with whom it partners to
decriminalize sex acts in the countries where reports of certain behaviors are
received. It will almost certainly also be used by countries and organizations
seeking to establish an international right to explicit “sex positive”
comprehensive sexuality education programs for even the youngest of children
under the “right to health.”
此種模式清楚表明一件事，即金賽現任的追隨者們正在使用金賽以前的老伎倆：蒐集可疑、無法核實且沒有代表性的數據，將其公之於眾并期待世人接受自己最糟糕的「真實面目」，從而達到修改法律以至於涵蓋甚至保護和推廣那些有害性行為和觀點之目的。（…）在收到特定性行為報告的國家中，這些數據很可能會被金賽研究院或與其合作的性權激進團體所利用，作為要求將這些性行為除罪化的證據。此外幾乎可以肯定的是，部分國家和組織也會利用這些數據來鼓吹建立一個讓幼童接受明確的「性積極」綜合型性教育之普世權利，枉顧兒童理應享有的「健康權」。
Call to Action
行動呼籲
The Kinsey Institute is already responsible, directly or indirectly,
for harming countless children and for fueling the sexual revolution worldwide. With ECOSOC accreditation, the potential for the Kinsey Institute to
do vastly greater harm is now a reality unless all who understand the threat
join together to warn parents, educators, policymakers and medical
professionals. We call upon all
responsible citizens, officers of government, civil society leaders and
organizations to join the Stop the Kinsey Institute Coalition to expose the
danger and oppose the efforts of the Kinsey Institute and all organizations
that advocate policies and programs based on its flawed research claims and
dangerous and unsupported sexual “rights” advocacy.
金賽研究院早已直接或間接地傷害了無數兒童，也造成了世界範圍內性革命的興起。而如今藉助聯合國經濟及社會理事會的認證，金賽研究院極有可能造成更大的危害。這並非危言聳聽，唯有所有清醒認識這個威脅的人們聯合起來，一起提醒父母、教育者、政策制定者和醫療專業人員們。我們呼籲所有有責任感的公民們、政府官員們、公民社會領袖們以及各團體組織加入「阻止金賽研究院聯盟」，共同揭露潛在的危機，讓世人了解，金賽研究院及相關組織一直鼓吹的政策和課程都是基於其錯誤的研究結果和危險而不得人心的性「權利」倡議，因而應當一齊竭力反對該機構的各種行動。
